<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AI Explain Tech Blog</title>
    <link>https://papers.ai-explain.org/</link>
    <description>Papers and plain-language articles by Fan Huang on human–AI alignment and the biases and limitations of large language models.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://papers.ai-explain.org/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Playing Civilization VI with AI agents: learning, adopting and creating strategy</title>
      <link>https://papers.ai-explain.org/blog/ai-agents-civilization-vi/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://papers.ai-explain.org/blog/ai-agents-civilization-vi/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Article</category>
      <description>A primer on how AI agents can play a strategy game like Civilization VI: how they learn strategies, put them to use and invent new ones, what happened when frontier models played full games, and what still stands in the way.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What does a language model believe? It depends on how you ask</title>
      <link>https://papers.ai-explain.org/blog/llm-belief-atlas-explained/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://papers.ai-explain.org/blog/llm-belief-atlas-explained/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Article</category>
      <description>A plain-language guide to the LLM Belief Atlas, and to why a model’s stance is not a single number.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The LLM Belief Atlas: Visualizing How Language-Model Stances Depend on Elicitation</title>
      <link>https://papers.ai-explain.org/papers/2026-001/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://papers.ai-explain.org/papers/2026-001/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Paper</category>
      <description>What a language model appears to believe about a proposition is not a scalar but a signal that depends on how it is elicited and read: forcing a choice can fabricate a value, option-logprob scoring carries order bias, and sycophancy makes…</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
